A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Health Services and Economic Impacts of the Limit of Detection in Emergency Department (LEGEND) Rule-Out Strategy in Australian Emergency Departments: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomised Trial. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to describe healthcare utilisation and costs associated with the assessment of suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) under standard care and to compare these outcomes with the Limit of Detection in Emergency Department (LEGEND) strategy, an accelerated diagnostic pathway identifying low-risk patients using a single highly sensitive troponin (hs-cTnI).

Method: A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial was conducted in four Queensland hospitals. Each transitioned from standard care (2016 ACS guidelines) to the LEGEND intervention at randomised intervals. Data were collected for index presentations and 6-month outcomes.

Results: Data were collected from 5347 patients in the standard care phase and 4597 in the LEGEND intervention phase. The intervention reduced mean ED length of stay (-72.0 min, 95% CI: -85.0 to -59.0 min) and inpatient admissions (-2.3%, 95% CI: -4.2% to -0.4%). For low-risk patients, the intervention further reduced ED length of stay (-97.0 min, 95% CI: -120.5 min to -73.5) and inpatient admissions (-4.2%, 95% CI: -6.9 to -1.6%). Exercise stress testing (EST) utilisation decreased by 3.6% (95% CI: 2.3%-4.9%) overall and 7.7% (95% CI: 5.0%-10.4%) among low-risk patients during the intervention phase. Total costs decreased from $6849 to $5794 per patient overall, saving $1055 per patient and from $2847 to $2129 per low-risk patient, saving $718 per patient.

Conclusions: The LEGEND strategy demonstrated reduced resource utilisation and costs compared to guideline-based ACS assessment, particularly for low-risk patients. Widespread adoption could improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of ACS assessment in the healthcare system.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12402291PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.70129DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

low-risk patients
16
standard care
12
limit detection
8
detection emergency
8
emergency department
8
department legend
8
stepped-wedge cluster
8
cluster randomised
8
randomised trial
8
utilisation costs
8

Similar Publications