98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Moral sensitivity and the ability to make ethical judgments are foundational competencies for ethical performance among nursing students. These two moral capabilities are not innate; rather, they must be cultivated through education. The effectiveness of teaching ethical concepts and employing suitable educational methods remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to assess the impact of debate-based nursing ethics training on the moral sensitivity and moral judgment of nursing students.
Methods: This study was conducted as a clinical trial involving 72 undergraduate nursing students. The participants were assigned to two groups: 37 students in the debate-based group and 35 in the lecture group. Demographic information, Lutzen moral sensitivity, and Rest moral judgment questionnaires were administered before the intervention and one month afterward. In the discussion group, students were divided into two subgroups of eighteen, with each subgroup participating in two 3-hour discussion sessions that addressed eleven scenarios focused on ethical challenges in nursing. In the lecture group, the session was conducted as a single four-hour lecture. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 16 software, employing paired and independent t-tests.
Results: The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of demographic variables (P<0.05).Prior to the study two groups, the mean of moral sensitivity were (52.89±19.33) and (54.87±13.32). In addition, the first and third stories of moral judgment did not reveal a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). After the study, the moral sensitivity scores in the lecture group were (73.16±14.23), compared to (86.13±11.48) in the debate-based group. A statistically significant difference was observed in the mean moral judgment scores between the lecture and debate-based groups (P<0.001) CONCLUSION: Teaching nursing ethics through both debate-based and lecture-based methods can enhance the moral sensitivity and judgment of nursing students. However, the debate-based method appears to be more effective. Given the significance of learning the Iranian Code of Nursing Ethics, both methods-particularly the debate-based approach-should be employed based on the educational context and available resources.
Clinical Trial Number: This study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials ( https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir ) on 2024-06-04, with the IRCT ID: IRCT20240215061016N2. ( https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/76848 ).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403841 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03795-2 | DOI Listing |
Pers Soc Psychol Bull
September 2025
Bowdoin College, Brunswick, ME, USA.
These studies examine whether expressing outrage at a prejudiced individual may undermine justice-insensitive White Americans' motivation to engage in more costly actions addressing systemic racism. Study 1 ( = 896) manipulated White privilege salience and the opportunity to express outrage before measuring donations to a racial justice organization. Reminders of racial privilege increased White collective guilt, and donations among White U.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Radiol
September 2025
Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim, Valencia, Spain.
Objectives: In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), non-invasive alternatives to biopsy-dependent driver mutation analysis are needed. We reviewed the effectiveness of radiomics alone or with clinical data and assessed the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) models in predicting oncogene mutation status.
Materials And Methods: A PRISMA-compliant literature review for studies predicting oncogene mutation status in NSCLC patients using radiomics was conducted by a multidisciplinary team.
J Educ Health Promot
July 2025
Research Center for Nursing and Midwifery Care, Non-Communicable Diseases Research Institute, Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Background: This study aimed to assess the effect of scenario-based learning (SBL) in legal midwifery education to enhance moral sensitivity and reasoning among midwifery students.
Materials And Methods: The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SOTL) was conducted at Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences between 2021 and 2022. A census sampling method was employed, enrolling 66 midwifery students.
The procedural account of prison legitimacy proposes that inmates' compliance with correctional institutions depends more on whether they feel that prison guards treat them fairly during their daily interactions than on whether the guards' decisions are ultimately favourable to them. In , Anthony Bottoms and Alison Liebling provide a compelling overview of their work in this area, highlighting the importance of respectful relationships for building feelings of trust in penal institutions and advancing a humanitarian account of legitimacy that is sensitive to the moral and relational dimensions of order maintenance. Despite their important contribution, Bottoms and Liebling's procedural approach advances a precarious notion of legitimacy that depends too heavily on the fair treatment of inmates by prison guards and too little on methods of inmate participation that might help the institution align its values with those of prisoners, creating a more stable, and truly normative, commitment towards compliance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Psychol
August 2025
School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Introduction: Sexual harassment, a pervasive form of gender-based violence, inflicts profound adverse effects on survivors. Observers' perceptions and responses critically shape subsequent attitudes and behaviors. A systematic comprehension of the determinants that influence observers' perception of harassment, as well as tendencies for victim-blaming and sympathy, is crucial for devising efficacious intervention strategies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF