A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Recommendations for Quality Assurance Guidelines for Gamma Knife Radiosurgery in Republic of Korea : A Multi-institutional Survey. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: The Leksell Gamma Knife (LGK) is one of the most precise radiosurgical tools available. However, the quality assurance (QA) practices for LGK vary considerably across institutions in Korea. In this study, we aim to identify and standardize key QA items, categorized into daily, monthly, biannual, and annual protocols, based on a nationwide survey conducted at 16 medical centers. Additionally, the tolerance values for each QA items were reviewed, comparing them with the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group (TG-178), and tailored to establish distinct Korean Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) tolerances reflecting local standards and regulatory requirements.

Methods: The survey focused on QA practices for the LGK Icon™/Esprit™ and Perfexion™ systems. The QA items were categorized into daily, monthly, biannual, and annual tasks in accordance with the guidelines set by TG-178. Sixteen participating institutions were asked to rate the importance of each QA item on a scale of 0 (not important) to 5 (extremely important). Items rated 4 or 5 were selected to create a national priority list.

Results: Eleven daily, six monthly, and three annual QA items were identified as high priority. Daily QA tasks primarily focused on radiation and patient safety, whereas the monthly tasks were largely related to dosimetric validation. Annual QA emphasizes mechanical and dosimetric checks. Biannual evaluations were not prioritized as they were routinely performed by the manufacturer's maintenance service (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden).

Conclusion: We succeeded in making recommendations for Gamma Knife QA standardization in Korea. Continuous QA updates are essential to ensure treatment safety, particularly with the introduction of new LGK models. These findings may contribute to the development of unified national QA guidelines for GKRS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2025.0118DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gamma knife
16
daily monthly
12
quality assurance
8
knife radiosurgery
8
practices lgk
8
items categorized
8
categorized daily
8
monthly biannual
8
biannual annual
8
items
5

Similar Publications