A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Surgery for Pediatric Choledochal Cyst Excision. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Choledochal cyst is treated with extrahepatic bile duct resection and hepaticojejunostomy. Minimally invasive approaches, including laparoscopic surgery (LS) and robotic surgery (RS), offer potential advantages over open surgery (OS), but their impact on perioperative and short-term postoperative outcomes remains unclear.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 201 pediatric patients who underwent OS (n=83), LS (n=89), or RS (n=29). OS was performed from 2004 to 2013, LS from 2013, and RS from 2021. Perioperative outcomes and early postoperative complications within one year were analyzed.

Results: RS resulted in significantly lower blood loss (median 1.6 [IQR 0.86-2.71] mL/kg) than OS (7.0 [IQR 3.88-9.70] mL/kg) (p<0.05). Time to oral intake was shortest in RS (median 3 [IQR 3-4] days) compared with LS and OS (both 4 [IQR 4-5] days) (p<0.05). Drain removal occurred earlier in RS (median 5 [IQR 5-6] days) than in LS (6 [IQR 6-8] days) and OS (6 [IQR 6-7] days) (p<0.05). Hospital stay was shorter with RS (median 7 [IQR 7-9] days) than with LS (10 [IQR 8-13] days) or OS (11 [IQR 10-14] days) (p<0.05). Operative time was shorter for OS (median 273 [IQR 240-321] min) than LS (396 [IQR 334-453] min) or RS (388 [IQR 345-530] min) (p<0.05). Median follow-up was 1 year (range, 1-3) for RS, 6 years (1-11) for LS, and 15 years (11-20) for OS. No significant differences were found in hepatolithiasis, anastomotic stricture, or cholangitis within the first postoperative year.

Conclusion: RS demonstrated superior short-term outcomes, including reduced blood loss, faster recovery, and shorter hospitalization, suggesting lower invasiveness. Further studies with larger cohorts and extended follow-up are needed to evaluate long-term prognosis.

Level Of Evidence: Ⅲ.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162642DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

postoperative outcomes
8
robotic surgery
8
choledochal cyst
8
comparison postoperative
4
outcomes open
4
open laparoscopic
4
laparoscopic robotic
4
surgery
4
surgery pediatric
4
pediatric choledochal
4

Similar Publications