98%
921
2 minutes
20
The tertiary survey serves to identify injuries and their consequences in the hours and days following polytrauma. A structured process has been proven to result in a high rate of previously missed additional diagnoses, leading to subsequent changes in patient management; however, to date there are no concrete practical recommendations or widespread implementation of the tertiary survey in German trauma centers. We recommend performing the tertiary survey for the first time as early as possible in the intensive care unit, followed by repeated assessments as needed when the patient´s clinical condition changes. Furthermore, we recommend utilizing the tertiary survey as a structured re-evaluation of the patient beyond physical examination. This should include the assessment of psychological stress, a thorough review of imaging and consultative findings and the collection of additional information regarding the accident and the patient´s medical history. After compiling all information further treatment plans should be evaluated and defined. The Trauma Section of the German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive and Emergency Medicine (DIVI) is developing a freely available tertiary survey form, which will undergo continuous optimization supported by scientific evaluation. In the long term, the goal is to provide a standardized tool for integration into local standard operating procedures of trauma centers, quality management systems and digital emergency care pathways.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00113-025-01600-y | DOI Listing |
Crit Care Sci
September 2025
Brazilian Biosciences National Laboratory, Brazilian Center for Research on Energy and Materials - Campinas (SP), Brazil.
Objective: To develop a score (Palineo score) to identify the palliative care needs of newborn patients admitted to a Brazilian neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary maternity hospital that serves as a reference center for high-risk pregnancies, ensuring timely follow-up by a specialist.
Methods: Patients were assessed by three specialists using a questionnaire that included the same clinical elements as those used for the Palineo score but did not assign scores to the criteria. The score was determined by the consensus reached by the specialists.
Acta Derm Venereol
September 2025
Department of Dermatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China.
Psoriasis-related stigmatization affects nurses' willingness to provide care, potentially compromising patient outcomes. However, limited research has examined this issue. A cross-sectional survey of 1,873 nurses was conducted, which assessed 4 stigmatization dimensions and their correlation with the willingness to care for patients with psoriasis, and explored the roles of education, working environment, and self-reported psoriasis knowledge.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Pharm Policy Pract
September 2025
Department of Health Sciences, School of Life and Health Sciences, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Background: Hypertension is a major global risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality. In Greece, prevalence is about 40%, with many cases undiagnosed or poorly managed. While doctors remain central to diagnosis and treatment, community pharmacists, as accessible healthcare professionals, can support early detection and ongoing management.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAntimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol
August 2025
Pharmacy Department, Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, NSW, Australia.
Background: Effective antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs must address the needs of culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) patients who often experience language barriers and varying cultural beliefs regarding antibiotics. They are at greater risk of receiving suboptimal or inappropriate care, yet guidance to support AMS practices for this population remains limited.
Aim: To investigate antibiotic knowledge, perspectives, and experiences of CALD patients.
JMIR Res Protoc
September 2025
Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Background: Cancer screening nonadherence persists among adults who are deaf, deafblind, and hard of hearing (DDBHH). These barriers span individual, clinician, and health care system levels, contributing to difficulties understanding cancer information, accessing screening services, and following treatment directives. Critical communication barriers include ineffective patient-physician communication, limited access to American Sign Language (ASL) cancer information, misconceptions about medical procedures, insurance navigation difficulties, and intersectional barriers for multiply marginalized individuals.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF