Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: In this project we evaluate the effectiveness of preferentially initiating highly effective treatment vs. an escalating treatment strategy at time of diagnosis in a real-world clinical setting. We compare treatment outcomes before and after the implementation of new guidelines in a Norwegian MS-clinic in 2017.

Method: Patients diagnosed and starting a DMT between the 1st of October 2013 and the 31st of December 2017 (Escalating Treatment Strategy group (ETS)) or between the 1st of January 2018 and the 31st of December 2020 (High intensity Treatment Strategy (HiTS) group) were included in the study. Baseline was defined as date of treatment start. To compare the two strategy groups, we performed cox proportional hazard regression analyses to evaluate time to first new relapse, time to new MRI lesion(s), and time to medication switch.

Results: 71.6% of patients diagnosed under the escalation treatment strategy (ETS), while 27.5% received highly effective treatment. 77.5% of patients diagnosed under the HiTS strategy initiated highly effective treatment, while 17.8% still initiated low -medium effective treatment. Median follow-up duration was 8.0 years in the ETS group and 4.0 in the HiTS group. Patients in the HiTS-group experienced a 70 % lower risk of having a new relapse compared to those in the ETS-group, with a hazard ratio (HR) = 0.30 (95% CI: 0.17 -0.54). The risk of experiencing a new MRI lesion (T2 or GD1+) was reduced by 77 % in the HiTS-group, with an HR of 0.23 (95% CI: 0.12 - 0.44). Additionally, the risk of switching treatment was reduced by 67% for the patients receiving highly effective treatment at diagnosis, with an HR of 0.33 (95% CI: 0.25 -0.45).

Conclusion: The risk of clinical and MRI-revealed disease breakthrough, as well as the need to switch treatment was significantly lower in persons with MS who initiated highly effective treatment early, compared to those following an escalating treatment strategy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2025.106702DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

effective treatment
28
highly effective
24
treatment strategy
24
treatment
17
escalating treatment
16
patients diagnosed
12
compared escalating
8
strategy
8
31st december
8
hits group
8

Similar Publications

Vanadium (V) is a trace element in the environment; it is detected in soil, water, air, dust, and food products. V-containing compounds have shown therapeutic potential in the treatment of diabetes. However, studies on the effects of V on animal behavior remain limited and sporadic.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) through nanozyme-mediated sonocatalytic therapy has demonstrated remarkable therapeutic efficacy in the field of cancer. Nevertheless, it remains a significant challenge for nanozymes with a single catalytic active center to generate sufficient ROS via Fenton or Fenton-like reactions to effectively induce tumor cell death. In order to enhance the catalytic efficacy, we devised and synthesized a multiple active centre and mitochondrial-targeted perovskite nanozyme (NCFP), doped with cobalt (Co) element, and incorporated 4-carboxybutyltriphenylphosphonium bromide (TPP) as a mitochondrial targeting marker for ultrasound (US)-assisted enzyme-like catalytic treatment of tumors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Existing longitudinal cohort study data and associated biospecimen libraries provide abundant opportunities to efficiently examine new hypotheses through retrospective specimen testing. Outcome-dependent sampling (ODS) methods offer a powerful alternative to random sampling when testing all available specimens is not feasible or biospecimen preservation is desired. For repeated binary outcomes, a common ODS approach is to extend the case-control framework to the longitudinal setting.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapies (iCBTs) are typically categorized into 2 types: therapist-assisted and self-guided. Both formats have accumulated substantial evidence supporting their cost-effectiveness and efficacy in treating a range of mental health conditions. However, therapist-assisted iCBTs tend to show lower dropout rates than self-guided versions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Electronic health records (EHRs) are a cornerstone of modern health care delivery, but their current configuration often fragments information across systems, impeding timely and effective clinical decision-making. In gynecological oncology, where care involves complex, multidisciplinary coordination, these limitations can significantly impact the quality and efficiency of patient management. Few studies have examined how EHR systems support clinical decision-making from the perspective of end users.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF