A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Identification of Clinical Phenotypes in Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: Insights Into Characteristics, Prognosis, and Management Strategies. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) accounts for a substantial share of acute coronary syndromes but remains challenging to diagnose and manage due to its varied presentations and underlying profiles. This study aims to identify key differences and distinct clinical phenotypes in a large T2MI population.

Methods: All consecutive patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing coronary angiography with a confirmed T2MI diagnosis between January 1, 2017, and March 31, 2023, were analyzed. Precipitating factors of supply-demand mismatch were identified, and coronary burden was assessed using the Gensini score. Latent class analysis was used to identify clinical phenotypes, and multivariable analyses were performed to determine prognostic predictors. A composite of major adverse cardiovascular events was assessed during follow-up, along with additional outcomes including cardiovascular death and nonfatal type 2 reinfarction.

Results: Among 774 patients with T2MI, latent class analysis identified 2 phenotypes. Phenotype 1 (31.5%) was younger with a higher prevalence of nonatherosclerotic coronary causes and unknown pathogeneses. Phenotype 2 (68.5%) exhibited greater comorbidity and a higher atherosclerotic burden, reflected by elevated Gensini scores (median, 11 versus 1.5; <0.001). Over a median follow-up of 53 months, major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 49.1% of patients, with a higher rate in phenotype 2 (60.8% versus 23.8%, <0.001). Predictors of major adverse cardiovascular events included peak cardiac troponin levels for phenotype 1 and age, known cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peak cardiac troponin levels, and Gensini score for phenotype 2.

Conclusions: This study identified 2 clinical phenotypes in T2MI, highlighting differences in characteristics, precipitating factors, outcomes, and prognostic predictors, emphasizing the potential for phenotype-driven approaches in diagnosis and management.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.125.042858DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical phenotypes
12
myocardial infarction
12
type myocardial
8
latent class
8
class analysis
8
identification clinical
4
phenotypes
4
phenotypes type
4
infarction insights
4
insights characteristics
4

Similar Publications