98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Mastoid vibration (MV) helps detect changes in spatial-temporal gait parameters and margin of stability, allowing researchers to study how sensory input influences motor control strategies. Additionally, ground reaction force (GRF) measurement has widely emerged as a more accessible alternative to camera-based motion capture systems for detecting balance control in healthy and pathological groups in smaller clinical settings.
Research Question: Would different MV affect the GRF parameters in healthy young individuals?
Methods: Twenty young adults experienced MV unilaterally or bilaterally during walking to temporarily disrupt vestibular function. Dependent variables included amplitude of GRF peaks, time-to-peaks, and respective variabilities in anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, and vertical directions during weight acceptance (initial contact to loading response) and push-off (terminal stance) phases.
Results: A significant effect of MV was found in the amplitude of GRF peaks in the AP (F = 20.607, p < 0.001) and in the ML directions (F = 20.607, p < 0.001) during the weight acceptance period. In the AP direction, bilateral MV reduced amplitude of GRF peaks more than no MV (p < 0.001) and unilateral MV (p = 0.002). Unilateral MV increased ML GRF peak amplitude when compared with the application of no MV (p = 0.001) or bilateral MV (p = 0.024). MV didn't affect the time-to-peak of GRF between conditions.
Conclusion: These observations suggested that different types of MV induced different patterns of GRFs and respective variabilities. This foundational knowledge paves the way for developing new methods to identify and diagnose specific vestibular disorders.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.08.071 | DOI Listing |
Gait Posture
August 2025
Research Center, Life University, Marietta, GA, USA. Electronic address:
Background: Mastoid vibration (MV) helps detect changes in spatial-temporal gait parameters and margin of stability, allowing researchers to study how sensory input influences motor control strategies. Additionally, ground reaction force (GRF) measurement has widely emerged as a more accessible alternative to camera-based motion capture systems for detecting balance control in healthy and pathological groups in smaller clinical settings.
Research Question: Would different MV affect the GRF parameters in healthy young individuals?
Methods: Twenty young adults experienced MV unilaterally or bilaterally during walking to temporarily disrupt vestibular function.
Hear Res
September 2025
Department of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Objective: This study investigates the effects of mastoid stimulus polarity on the recording of bone-conducted ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs). The goal was to analyze how different stimulus polarities, specifically condensation and rarefaction, influence the amplitude and latency of oVEMP responses.
Methods: Monocyclic sinusoidal tone bursts at 250 Hz and 500 Hz were used to stimulate the vestibular system in 21 participants with normal hearing and normal vestibular function.
Exp Physiol
March 2025
Independent Researcher, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Ageing-related sensory deteriorations are significantly associated with poor balance control among older individuals, resulting in a higher risk of falling in a dark environment. In particular, the proprioceptive system plays a critical role in maintaining balance. This study aimed to determine how ageing-related sensory deteriorations contributed to balance control during standing under various sensory conflicts.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Neurol
February 2025
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Interdisciplinary Center for Vertigo, Balance and Ocular Motor Disorders, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), University of Zurich (UZH), Zurich, Switzerland.
In this paper we give an introduction to the area, followed by brief reviews of the neural response to sound and vibration, and then the velocity storage integrator, before putting forward our hypothesis about the neural input to the velocity storage integrator. Finally we discuss some of the implications of our hypothesis. There are two pathways conveying neural information from the vestibular periphery (the semicircular canals and the otoliths) to central neural mechanisms-a direct and an indirect pathway.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF