Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

What Was The Educational Challenge?: Due to the complexity of professionalism, medical education programs worldwide have implemented several new support and assessment tools based on unprofessional behavior to help students form their professional identities. Despite several attempts to conceptualize professionalism, providing a framework for faculty members and students is still challenging.

What Was The Solution?: To provide a simple yet clear framework to support and assess clinical and preclinical settings, we used four domains for professional identity formation: Involvement, Integrity, Interaction, and Introspection. These domains were previously suggested for describing unprofessional behavior. In creating the novel professional identity formation (PIF) framework, each domain was filled by denominators of professionality transformed from denominators of unprofessional behavior.

How Was The Solution Implemented?: By characterizing professional qualities rather than unprofessional ones, we intended to shift the focus to desirable traits to be used for PIF. The framework of cornerstones was first introduced as a formative and summative assessment in clinical rotations, used for feed-forward during reflection groups, and associated written reflections discussing experiences during clinical rotations and then also in preclinical tutorial groups for medical students.

What Lessons Were Learned That Are Relevant To A Wider Global Audience?: The framework enables faculty members to give constructive, concrete feedback and coach students in developing their future professions. The framework is not resource-sensitive and can be implemented without technological or system barriers in a variety of environments and was therefore easy to implement in both a preclinical and clinical setting.

What Are The Next Steps?: The cornerstone framework can easily be adapted to other health professionals and cultural contexts. The four domains and their denominators are generic and not limited to PIF for medical students. A longitudinal study is planned to evaluate its long-term impact on professional development.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2025.2550479DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

professional identity
12
identity formation
12
medical education
8
unprofessional behavior
8
faculty members
8
pif framework
8
clinical rotations
8
framework
7
cornerstones professional
4
formation developing
4

Similar Publications

Aim: To co-design a resilience-based mentoring program for novice midwives in Western Australia, informed by the experiences of past midwifery graduates and the perspectives of midwives in senior roles.

Background: Effective workforce planning and retention strategies are essential in preventing the continued loss of midwives and in attracting newly qualified midwives to healthcare organisations. Transitioning from student to registered midwife is a known period of vulnerability that requires structured, evidence-informed support.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Interprofessional Education (IPE) is widely recognized as essential for fostering collaborative healthcare practices and improving patient outcomes. Despite its acknowledged importance, there remains a notable scarcity of longitudinal research assessing medical students' readiness for IPE across distinct educational stages, particularly within diverse global contexts like Brazil.

Aim: This study sought to address this gap by longitudinally mapping and analyzing the evolution of medical students' readiness for interprofessional learning throughout their academic training at a Brazilian university.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Ceremonies and symbols have been used to create a professional identity and recognize nursing graduates. This study describes the current use of recognition programs and the relationship between pinning ceremonies and demographic variables.

Method: A researcher-constructed survey, with forced-choice and open-ended questions, was distributed electronically to deans and directors of accredited entry-level nursing programs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF