A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Comparison of Two Lung Ultrasound Protocols for Identification and Distribution of B-, I-, and Z-Lines in Clinically Healthy Cats. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: To investigate the frequency and distribution of B-, I-, and Z-lines in clinically healthy cats and to determine whether there is a difference in frequency and distribution between two different lung ultrasound protocols.

Design: Prospective cross-sectional study from June to September 2022.

Setting: Companion animal referral hospital.

Animals: Sixty-four cats determined to be healthy based on history and physical examination.

Interventions: All cats had point-of-care lung ultrasound performed with frequency of B-, I-, and Z-lines recorded. Findings of a modified Calgary pleura and lung ultrasound (PLUS) protocol (19 sites recorded) and a veterinary Brief Lung Ultrasound Exam (VetBLUE) protocol (nine sites), both including the subxiphoid site, were compared.

Measurements And Main Results: B-lines were identified in 14%-27% of cats depending on the protocol used, with a median of <3 B-lines total per cat, <2 B-lines per hemithorax, and ≤2 positive B-line sites per hemithorax, regardless of the protocol used. The total number of B-, I-, or Z-lines identified was significantly higher for the modified Calgary PLUS compared with VetBLUE. The number of cats with ≥1 B- and I-lines was significantly higher with modified Calgary PLUS compared with VetBLUE, with 17 (26.6%) and 42 (65.6%) versus nine (14.1%) and 34 (53.1%) cats identified, respectively. Z-lines were identified in 62 (96.9%) cats regardless of the protocol used. Three (4.7%) cats had ≥1 B-line at the subxiphoid view.

Conclusions: B-lines were detected in <30%, I-lines in >50%, and Z-lines in >95% of clinically healthy cats regardless of protocol used. B-lines were rarely detected at the subxiphoid view. A significant difference between protocols was found when comparing the percentage of cats with B- and I-lines.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vec.70011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lung ultrasound
20
distribution z-lines
8
z-lines clinically
8
clinically healthy
8
healthy cats
8
frequency distribution
8
protocol sites
8
ultrasound
5
cats
5
comparison lung
4

Similar Publications