A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Addressing complexity: The development and pilot testing of a user-friendly Medicare Part D patient decision aid tool. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Selecting a Medicare Part D prescription drug plan can be challenging because of limited health insurance literacy and complex plan features. Existing online tools, such as the Medicare Plan Finder (MPF), often lack personalization.

Objective: To describe the conceptualization and development of a personalized Medicare Part D decision aid (DA) to supplement the MPF.

Methods: A user-centered, iterative design process informed by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and International Patient Decision Aid Standards was used to develop a DA that helps older adults with Part D plan selection. First, a literature review and 1-hour interviews with Medicare-eligible individuals informed the development of a prototype. These individuals formed a stakeholder advisory board (SAB). The first prototype was then alpha tested with 2 SAB focus groups. Using focus group feedback, the final prototype was developed. Beta testing participants, including Medicare-eligible individuals and Medicare counselors, were recruited and completed an online version of the DA, alongside pre-DA and post-DA questionnaires to examine DA effectiveness using a modified Health Insurance Literacy Measure, a modified System Usability Scale, and a user satisfaction survey.

Results: Before the development of the prototype, SAB interviewees (n = 9) suggested that simplified explanations of insurance terminology and side-by-side comparisons of options would be important to the DA. Alpha testing (n = 7) feedback was used to modify the first prototype to improve usability and clarity. Among 25 beta testing participants, Health Insurance Literacy Measure scores increased from 19.76 (SD = 7.15) before using the aid to 24.13 (SD = 4.02) afterward ( = 0.0009). Approximately one-quarter of participants indicated that they would change to a new plan after the tool, whereas half affirmed that the DA validated their existing plan choice.

Conclusions: This pilot study shows that a user-centered, interactive DA can improve health insurance literacy and support Medicare Part D plan decisions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12398625PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.9.868DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

health insurance
16
insurance literacy
16
decision aid
12
patient decision
8
medicare plan
8
medicare-eligible individuals
8
development prototype
8
beta testing
8
testing participants
8
literacy measure
8

Similar Publications