Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Wrist-worn photoplethysmography (PPG) enables scalable, long-term unobtrusive sleep monitoring through the expression of sympathetic and parasympathetic activity in heart rate variability. However, interindividual differences in the sympatho-vagal balance may inherently limited general PPG-based sleep staging models. This study investigates whether learning individual autonomic representations through model personalization can improve PPG based automated sleep staging performance.- Approach: Concurrent wrist-worn PPG and wearable electroencephalography (EEG) were collected during home monitoring for up to seven nights in a heterogeneous sleep-disordered population (n=59). Personalization was performed through finetuning (i.e., partial retraining) a general PPG-based model by coupling the subject-specific PPG data with the wearable EEG stage classifications. Performance of the general and personalized models were compared on PPG acquired during a gold-standard clinical polysomnography, testing their agreement on 4-stage classification (W/N1+N2/N3/REM) with the manual scoring. Main Result: Overall performance increased in 82.5% of the subjects, with significantly improved performance reached when personalizing the model on three or more training nights. Performance increased with personalization on additional training nights for each stage: wake (β=.005, p<.001), N1+N2 (β=.003, p<.001), N3 (β=.004, p<.001), and REM (β=.005, p<.001). Effects were strongest for younger individuals (β=.009, p<.001) and patients with insomnia (β=.011, p<.001). Personalization greatly impacted the derived sleep macrostructural sleep parameters, with considerable improvement in N3 sleep classification, and in capturing REM fragmentation. Significance: Personalization can overcome one-size-fits-all limitations of a general model and should be considered for PPG-based sleep staging when an altered autonomic modulation is expected that deviates from the general model's global representation. .
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ae0119 | DOI Listing |