A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Comparison of eDNA with conventional infauna sampling when assessing pollution impacts. | LitMetric

Comparison of eDNA with conventional infauna sampling when assessing pollution impacts.

Mar Pollut Bull

Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, 20 Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, Hobart, 7004, Tasmania, Australia.

Published: August 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) methods are increasingly used to assess marine pollution, offering a promising tool for ecosystem monitoring. However, these approaches still require validation against traditional techniques, such as sediment fauna (macrobenthos) sampling using a van Veen grab to assess the effects of marine pollutants on the benthic assemblage. Using a suite of environmental and pollutant parameters sampled across southeastern Australia, we investigated the sensitivity of three metabarcoding assays (16S rRNA, 18S rRNA, and mitochondrial COI) versus traditional but labour-intensive macrobenthos sampling for detecting potential impacts of pollutants. Both eDNA metabarcoding and macrobenthos sampling detected pollutant-associated impacts, with eDNA more sensitive to heavy metals, and macrobenthos more responsive to organic pollutants.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.118581DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

macrobenthos sampling
12
comparison edna
4
edna conventional
4
conventional infauna
4
sampling
4
infauna sampling
4
sampling assessing
4
assessing pollution
4
pollution impacts
4
impacts environmental
4

Similar Publications