A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Suction in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Section of Endourology. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: To conduct a meta-analysis comparing the outcomes of vacuum-assisted access sheath (VAAS) mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) vs conventional access sheath (CAS) mPCNL.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, with registration in PROSPERO (CRD42024619780). A comprehensive search identified comparative studies (randomised controlled trials and observational studies). The primary outcomes included operating time, stone-free rate (SFR) and complications. Secondary outcomes included transfusion rates, haemoglobin deficit, and length of hospital stay. Data were analysed using Review Manager V5.4, with quality of evidence assessed using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool.

Results: Fourteen studies with 2510 patients (1298 in the VAAS and 1212 in the CAS mPCNL groups) were included. VAAS mPCNL significantly reduced operating time, by 17.45 (13.12-21.79) min (P < 0.001), and was associated with a higher SFR: odds ratio (OR) 1.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.57, 2.35; P < 0.001). The VAAS mPCNL group also had a lower postoperative fever rate (OR 0.45 [95% CI 0.35, 0.61]; P < 0.001) and a lower sepsis rate (OR 0.45 [95% CI 0.22, 0.93]; P = 0.03). The overall complication rate for VAAS mPCNL was significantly lower than for CAS mPCNL (P < 0.001), with fewer minor complications. Hospital stay was shorter for VAAS mPCNL (mean reduction of 0.79 days; P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in transfusion rates (OR 0.78 [95% CI 0.46, 1.31]; P = 0.3) or haemoglobin deficit (0.00 g/dL [95% CI 0.22-0.22]; P > 0.9).

Conclusion: The use of VAAS mPCNL offers significant advantages over CAS mPCNL, including shorter operating time, improved stone clearance, and reduced complications. These findings support the use of VAAS mPCNL in managing kidney stones, with further high-quality studies recommended.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.16891DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy
8
access sheath
8
outcomes included
8
operating time
8
suction mini-percutaneous
4
nephrolithotomy meta-analysis
4
meta-analysis european
4
european association
4
association urology
4
urology endourology
4

Similar Publications