A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Integrating breast cancer polygenic risk scores at scale in the WISDOM Study: a national randomized personalized screening trial. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The Women Informed to Screen Depending On Measures of risk (WISDOM) Study is the first prospective, population-wide application of personalized breast cancer screening. We aim to demonstrate the feasibility of the study's novel use of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) to tailor screening, evaluate our strategy for adapting PRSs to diverse populations, and quantify the impact of incorporating PRS on the study's screening recommendations.

Methods: WISDOM is a randomized, preference-tolerant screening trial in the USA testing the safety and morbidity of risk-based versus annual screening in women aged 40-74 without a prior history of breast cancer. This early report includes participants in the risk-based arm only and compares screening recommendations generated by the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) clinical risk model alone versus the BCSC model modified by a PRS (BCSC-PRS). The main outcome of interest is the proportion of participants with a change in screening recommendation after integrating PRS for risk stratification.

Results: In the risk-based arm, 21,631 participants received a PRS. Small but statistically significant differences in the PRS were seen between major racial and ethnic groups (p < 0.001), and higher PRS was associated with greater extent of family history (p < 0.001) and denser breasts (p < 0.001). BCSC-PRS risk estimates changed the screening recommendations for 14% of women aged 40-49 compared to BCSC alone and for 10% of women aged 50-74. Projected net screening encounters at the population level were similar for both age groups.

Conclusions: In a first-in-kind application of PRS to inform breast cancer screening approaches, we demonstrate feasibility for scaled implementation, moderate changes to individual screening recommendations, and minimal projected downstream burden on the healthcare system.

Trial Registration: Prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02620852 on 12/2/2015.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12395744PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-025-01524-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast cancer
16
polygenic risk
8
risk scores
8
wisdom study
8
screening
8
screening trial
8
risk-based arm
8
risk
5
prs
5
integrating breast
4

Similar Publications