98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS) is a rare malignancy and the standard of care, precludes future childbearing. Although fertility-sparing treatment (FST) may be considered in carefully selected patients, high-quality evidence regarding its efficacy and safety is limited. This review aims to systematically evaluate the oncologic and reproductive outcomes associated with conservative treatment for LG-ESS.
Methods: Pubmed Database, Scopus Database and Embase Database were screened in September 2024 from the first publication about women with LG-ESS treated with a surgical FST. We included the studies containing data about oncologic, and reproductive outcomes. This study adheres to PRISMA guidelines and is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024605140). The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
Results: 9 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria, and 89 patients were analyzed. Recurrence was observed in 51 out of 89 patients (57.3 %) with a mean recurrence-free interval ranging between 3 and 40.5 months. A mortality rate of 1.1 % was observed, with a mean follow-up duration ranging from 38.5 to 84.5 months. The overall pregnancy rate was 41.5 % and the live birth rate was 78.1 %. The preterm delivery rate was 8 % and 3.9 % of patients required assisted reproduction technology.
Conclusions: Considering the limitations of the available evidence, FST in women with LG-ESS carries a relatively high risk of tumor relapse, though it does not increase the risk of death. Fertility outcomes seem to be encouraging. Resection of the malignant uterine lesion combined with adjuvant hormonal treatment may be considered for selected early-stage patients, with close follow-up.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110382 | DOI Listing |
J Gynecol Oncol
August 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Objective: Cervical cancer is the leading malignancy in terms of both incidence and mortality among cancers of the female reproductive system, and initial surgical treatment is still one of the main treatments. However, for many years, radical hysterectomy based on traditional anatomical principles has failed to substantially improve oncological outcomes for cervical cancer patients or reduce the incidence of perioperative complications. In recent years, radical surgery grounded in the membrane anatomy concept of embryonic development has demonstrated promising oncological outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLancet Oncol
September 2025
Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. Electronic address: majun2@
The Chinese Society for Therapeutic Radiology Oncology, the Chinese Anti-Cancer Association, the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, the Head and Neck Cancer International Group, the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, and the American Society for Radiation Oncology collaboratively developed evidence-based guidelines and a comprehensive contouring atlas for neck target volume delineation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. These guidelines address five key challenges in modern radiotherapy practice: margin design of clinical target volume; nodal target volume delineation after induction chemotherapy; delineation of equivocal nodes evident on imaging; low-risk clinical target volume delineation based on regional stepwise extension patterns; and modifications for anatomical boundaries of lymphatic areas. Developed through a rigorous systematic review and expert appraisal process by a panel of 50 international, multidisciplinary members from 17 countries and regions, these guidelines incorporate the latest advances in nasopharyngeal carcinoma diagnosis and treatment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLancet Oncol
September 2025
Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. Electronic address: majun2@
The Chinese Society for Therapeutic Radiology Oncology, the Chinese Anti-Cancer Association, the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Head and Neck Cancer International Group, the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, and the American Society for Radiation Oncology jointly developed evidence-based guidelines and a contouring atlas for primary target volume delineation for radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The guidelines systematically address three crucial challenges: margin design of clinical target volumes; target volume delineation after induction chemotherapy; and low-risk clinical target volume delineation based on local stepwise extension patterns. Based on a comprehensive systematic review and critical appraisal by an international multidisciplinary panel of 50 nasopharyngeal carcinoma specialists from 17 countries and regions, these guidelines are in keeping with advances in nasopharyngeal carcinoma diagnosis and treatment, embodying contemporary treatment concepts, and elaborating on the differences in practice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBr J Anaesth
September 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai Key Lab of Reproduction and Development, Shanghai Key Lab of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, 200433, Shanghai, China. Electronic address:
Gynecol Oncol
September 2025
CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Gynecologic Surgery, CHU Estaing, 1 Place Lucie et Raymond Aubrac, 63000 Clermont Ferrand, France; Université Clermont Auvergne, EnCoV, Institut Pascal, UMR 6602 CNRS, SIGMA Clermont, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Objectives: This is a retrospective study designed to assess the impact of two-stage versus single-stage surgical management on survival in patients with FIGO III-IV ovarian neoplasia receiving surgical management.
Methods: This is a retrospective, multicenter study, based on the FRANCOGYN group database. Two groups were studied, the first having primary surgical management in a single operation, and the second having two-stage sequence primary surgical management.