A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: Network is unreachable

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Toward Standardized Assessment of Dynamic Subjective Visual Vertical: Effects of Visual Stimulus Intensity in Health and Multiple Sclerosis. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

: Decreased balance function in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients is influenced by impaired gravity perception, which can be measured by the subjective visual vertical (SVV) test. The value of this test can be increased by executing it in a moving visual background (i.e., dynamic SVV). However, clinicians and researchers use varying dynamic stimulus properties due to the lack of consensus on optimal parameters for reliably distinguishing between health and disease. : To evaluate how dynamic visual stimulus intensity affects the perception of verticality in patients with MS and healthy individuals. : We assessed static and dynamic SVV in 31 MS patients with dizziness and 32 age- and sex-matched controls using the virtual reality application VIRVEST. We evaluated the effects of modifying two parameters in dynamic SVV testing: rotation velocity (10°/s, 30°/s, and 60°/s) and visual field coverage (small vs. large). : The median of static SVV deviations was significantly greater in the MS group (1.8° vs. 0.9°). The mildest dynamic stimulus intensity of 10°/s, with a small visual field coverage, yielded the greatest discriminatory capacity to differentiate between the groups (AUC = 0.897; < 0.001). This stimulus elicited a median SVV deviation of 4.3° in the MS group and 2.1° in the control group ( < 0.001) while also inducing significantly lower test-induced dizziness compared with stronger stimuli. Median visual dependence values measured at 10°/s with a small visual field coverage were 4.2 in the MS group and 2.02 in the control group ( < 0.001), also yielding the greatest AUC values compared to stronger stimuli (AUC = 0.828; < 0.001). : Our results support the use of relatively mild dynamic stimulus intensity. Future studies are encouraged to evaluate different dynamic stimulus parameters and patient populations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12387991PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081482DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stimulus intensity
16
dynamic stimulus
16
dynamic svv
12
visual field
12
field coverage
12
dynamic
9
visual
9
subjective visual
8
visual vertical
8
visual stimulus
8

Similar Publications