A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Reduced Computed Tomography Scan Speed Improves Alignment Errors for Patients Undergoing Thoracic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

: We investigated the performance of a slow computed tomography (CT) protocol to reduce alignment errors arising from motion when using CT-on-rail (CTOR) for image guidance for patients receiving thoracic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). : A Quasar lung phantom with a moving tumor was programmed with three breathing rates and three motion amplitudes. MIP and average 4DCT images were used for contouring and alignment, respectively. Ten CTOR images were obtained for each of the breathing rates and amplitudes, under both CT protocols. We used in-house CAT software for image guidance, centering the tumor in the lung window within the gross tumor volume contour. Longitudinal coordinate reproducibility was compared between the two protocols. We also retrospectively analyzed CBCT SBRT image guidance alignment data from 31 patients to evaluate the systematic error in the longitudinal direction between simulation and daily treatments. : The mean (standard deviation) alignments (mm) for the standard and slow CT protocol ranged from 0.7 (0.68) and 1.0 (0.0), respectively, for the 28 BPM breathing rate and 5 mm amplitude combination to 5.2 (2.0) and 1.6 (0.52) for the 8 BPM breathing rate and 15 mm amplitude combination. Our retrospective analysis of patient alignment data showed a notable systematic difference in the relative bone and gross tumor volume alignment between the simulation and daily cone beam CT datasets. The mean longitudinal difference was -0.19 cm (standard deviation, 0.17 cm; range, 0.28 cm to -1.14 cm). Therefore, the position of the vertebral body cannot be used as a surrogate for mean tumor position in the longitudinal direction. Longitudinal position must be accurately determined for each patient using multiple CT images. : A slow CT protocol improved the alignment with slower breathing rates being more challenging. A 5 mm PTV is not sufficient for tumor motion greater than 9 mm. Averaging the coordinates from multiple CTOR images is recommended.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12384547PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers17162646DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

image guidance
12
breathing rates
12
computed tomography
8
alignment errors
8
thoracic stereotactic
8
stereotactic body
8
body radiation
8
radiation therapy
8
ctor images
8
gross tumor
8

Similar Publications