A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Collaborative filtering models an experimental and detailed comparative study. | LitMetric

Collaborative filtering models an experimental and detailed comparative study.

Sci Rep

School of Advanced Sciences, VIT-AP University, Inavolu, Amaravathi, 522241, Andhra Pradhesh, India.

Published: August 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Recommender systems have become indispensable tools in various domains, such as e-commerce, entertainment, and social media, for delivering personalized user experiences. Collaborative Filtering (CF) is an essential technique in RS that leverages user similarity patterns to suggest items which align with individual preferences. This study presents an experimental comparative analysis of collaborative filtering-based recommender system methods including memory-based methods (KNN variants), model-based approaches (SVD, SVD++, co-clustering), and techniques based on neural networks (NCF, DeepFM, LightGCN). We conduct a thorough evaluation of these methods on the MovieLens benchmark datasets (100K, 1M, 25M) utilizing various metrics, such as RMSE, MAE, FCP, NDCG@10, Precision@10, Recall@10, and F1@10 Score, aiming to identify the most effective approaches and understand the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Additionally, we provide detailed insights into the working mechanisms of each model. Our comprehensive analysis reveals the strengths and limitations of each method, offering critical insights for practitioners in selecting the most suitable recommender system technique based on specific requirements and constraints. The findings indicate that, on large datasets, neural and graph-based models achieve measurable improvements in both rating accuracy and top-k ranking tasks, with ranking gains observed upto 15%. Nonetheless, more straightforward approaches (KNN, SVD) continue to hold their ground in smaller datasets or low-resource environments because of their straightforward implementation and clarity in interpretation. The results highlight the importance of achieving a balance between computational expense, scalability, and model intricacy when choosing collaborative filtering techniques for practical implementations of recommender systems. We offer practical insights to assist professionals in selecting models that are suited to particular application needs and data attributes. This research enhances the understanding of collaborative filtering techniques and offers valuable insights for improving the performance of RS across diverse domains.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12391434PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15096-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

collaborative filtering
16
recommender systems
8
recommender system
8
filtering techniques
8
collaborative
5
filtering models
4
models experimental
4
experimental detailed
4
detailed comparative
4
comparative study
4

Similar Publications