A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Accuracy assessment of a cochlear implant imaging tool using clinical computed tomography images. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

In today's clinical routine, imaging tools are increasingly used for cochlear implant surgical planning and assessment. However, low resolution and artifacts of computer tomography (CT) images often prevent a reliable assessment of the cochlea geometry, as well as introduced trauma from the surgery. This study evaluated the reliability of a cochlear implant imaging tool for evaluation of clinical CT scans. 20 sets of clinical pre- and postoperative CT images, implanted with Advanced Bionics SlimJ and Mid-Scala electrode arrays, were analyzed using fusion imaging, manual measurements, and the imaging tool. The compared outcomes included cochlea diameter and width, angular insertion depth, and electrode scalar location. Cochlea diameter (A) and width (B) demonstrated excellent and good inter-rater agreement between the imaging tool and manual measurements, respectively, while angular insertion depth and electrode scalar location showed excellent agreement. The imaging tool achieved an overall high accuracy of 96.9%, with a sensitivity of 83.0% and specificity of 98.3% for assessing the electrode scalar location. The imaging tool exhibited high accuracy and good to excellent agreement with other established assessment methods for clinical CTs. With its strong usability and fast evaluations, this evidence supports the tool's reliable use in clinical practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12391491PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-16600-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

imaging tool
24
cochlear implant
12
electrode scalar
12
scalar location
12
imaging
8
implant imaging
8
tomography images
8
manual measurements
8
cochlea diameter
8
diameter width
8

Similar Publications