Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: This study aimed to screen for hypertension in a vast Indonesian population using machine learning (ML) and 11 non-laboratory risk factors, validating the results through internal and external validations.
Setting And Participants: From the initial 1 782 365 participants aged 15 and above registered at the Integrated Counseling Post primary care centres across Indonesia from 2014 to 2017, incomplete data and outliers were excluded, and 268 210 participants were included in our analysis. The dataset was split deterministically into a dataset for training using 10-fold internal cross-validation of 204 315 participants and another dataset for external validation of 63 895 participants.
Design: This retrospective cross-sectional study used three ML algorithms, that is, random forest, gradient boosting and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and compared them against logistic regression as a benchmark to screen hypertension based on the WHO and International Society of Hypertension criteria. The importance of the risk factors was ranked. By partly using continuous versus categorical age, waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI) risk factors, we evaluated the screening performance regarding sensitivity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
Results: The external validations revealed that the XGBoost model performed the best in hypertension screening. The external validation, which partly uses continuous variables, provides 0.97 sensitivity and 0.75 AUC, indicating excellent screening capability. The importance rank of the risk factors was consecutively family history of hypertension (FH-HTN), age, WC, BMI, occupation, education, sex, smoking, low physical activity, lack of fruit or vegetable intake and alcohol consumption.
Conclusions: By using 11 easy-to-collect non-laboratory risk factors, the ML model successfully screens for hypertension with better performance than the benchmark. Using the numerical variables of age, WC and BMI yields a better discrimination capability than the categorical variables. FH-HTN and age are the two top risk factors for the development of hypertension. This study is a useful academic exercise and shows ML's importance in handling large data sets.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406909 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092364 | DOI Listing |