Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objectives: To evaluate the reliability and accuracy of a portable structured light-based three-dimensional (3D) imaging system for volumetric measurement in the periorbital region.
Methods: Five hemispherical 3D printed resin models with different sizes and colors, including the flesh-colored models with 6 (Model 1), 4 (Model 2), and 2 (Model 3) mm in diameter, and the black (Model 4) and gray (Model 5) models with 6 mm in diameter, were affixed to the lower eyelid or upper eyelid of 40 volunteers. One researcher used the portable 3D imaging system to collect the 3D images and two raters measured the volume of the models on images. Intra-device, intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities and accuracy of the volumetric measurement were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), mean absolute difference (MAD), technical error of measurement (TEM), relative error measurement (REM), and relative TEM (rTEM).
Results: The intra-device reliability of the 3D imaging system for volumetric measurement in the periorbital region was excellent (ICC = 0.922, MAD = 0.11 mm, TEM = 0.09 mm, REM = 0.19%, rTEM = 0.15%). The intra-rater reliability for volumetric measurement of the Model 1 on the lower eyelid was the highest (ICC = 0.953, MAD = 0.08 mm, TEM = 0.06 mm, REM = 0.13%, rTEM = 0.11%). The inter-rater reliability for volumetric measurement of the Model 1 on the lower eyelid was the highest (ICC = 0.889, MAD = 0.14 mm, TEM = 0.11 mm, REM = 0.24%, rTEM = 0.19%). The accuracy for volumetric measurement of the Model 1 on the lower eyelid was the highest (MAD = 0.24 mm, REM = 0.43%).
Conclusion: The portable 3D imaging system proved to measure the volumes of periorbital flesh-colored objects reliably and accurately. This finding demonstrated that this device has great potential for diagnosis, post-operative evaluation, and long-term follow-up of volumetric changes in oculoplastics.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12370631 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1647489 | DOI Listing |