A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Pure Hyaluronic Acid to the Hyaluronic Acid-Calcium Hydroxylapatite Combination for Temporal Volumization. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Hyaluronic acid (HA) and calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) are commonly used for facial volumization, with HA offering hydration and reversibility, whereas CaHA provides structural support and collagen biostimulation. Recently, a combination of HA and CaHA has been proposed to enhance both immediate volumization and long-term tissue remodeling. However, its efficacy for volume retention remains unclear.

Objectives: In this study, the authors aim to compare the volumetric retention and clinical outcomes of HA alone vs a manually prepared HA-CaHA mixture in the temporal region over a 90-day follow-up.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial included 20 patients (40 hemifaces) treated with either 0.5 mL of HA alone (G1) or a 40% HA and 60% CaHA mixture (G2). Fillers were injected subcutaneously using a 22 G cannula with a fan technique. Volumetric changes were assessed through 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry, and the Allergan Temple Scale (ATS) evaluated qualitative outcomes.

Results: Both groups showed significant ATS score improvements over time ( < .001), but volumetric analysis demonstrated greater retention in G1 (0.231 ± 0.255 mL) compared with G2 (0.028 ± 0.135 mL, = .016).

Conclusions: The hypothesized synergy of the HA-CaHA combination was not observed. HA alone provided superior long-term volumization, suggesting that manual HA-CaHA mixing may alter filler performance. Further studies should explore premixed formulations and optimize treatment protocols.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12371837PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojaf076DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hyaluronic acid
8
randomized clinical
4
clinical trial
4
trial comparing
4
comparing pure
4
pure hyaluronic
4
acid hyaluronic
4
hyaluronic acid-calcium
4
acid-calcium hydroxylapatite
4
hydroxylapatite combination
4

Similar Publications