A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Cyclic response of ventilated precast shear walls with emphasis on sleeve connection efficiency. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Precast concrete walls are widely used in modular construction due to their speed of assembly and structural efficiency. However, the presence and size of openings can significantly influence their seismic performance. This study investigates the effect of opening dimensions on the seismic behavior of precast wall specimens subjected to cyclic lateral loading, with a focus on failure mechanisms, hysteretic response, load capacity, and deformability. Two groups of specimens were evaluated: Group A with precast wall (PW-6) 600 mm wide and Group B (PW-4) with 400 mm wide. The experimental results revealed a three-stage failure mechanism, where Group A experienced pronounced diagonal cracking due to reduced confinement, while Group B showed more localized crushing near the opening edges. Hysteresis behavior indicated greater pinching and reduced energy dissipation in Group A, whereas Group B exhibited fuller loops with better energy absorption. Group A's initial stiffness of 25.6 kN/mm declined to 9.8 kN/mm at failure, while Group B maintained higher stiffness retention and achieved a 12% higher peak lateral load. Ductility ratios were also superior in Group B compared to Group A, highlighting the critical role of confinement and detailing. The objective of this study is to quantify the influence of opening size on seismic response, and the methodology involved reduced-scale cyclic testing of precast wall panels with consistent reinforcement but varying opening widths. The findings provide valuable design insight for enhancing the seismic resilience of precast walls in high-risk zones.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12381032PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15816-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

precast wall
12
group
10
precast
6
cyclic response
4
response ventilated
4
ventilated precast
4
precast shear
4
shear walls
4
walls emphasis
4
emphasis sleeve
4

Similar Publications