A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

"Single-dose versus 24-hour antibiotic prophylaxis in reduction mammaplasty: a randomized controlled trial". | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: This trial aimed to compare the influence of administering a single dose or 24h of prophylactic antibiotics on surgical site infection (SSI) rates after reduction mammaplasty.

Methods: This is a randomized, non-inferiority, parallel-arm clinical trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. One hundred forty-six participants undergoing reduction mammaplasty were randomly assigned to the placebo group (PG), which received cefazolin 1g at the time of anesthesia induction (n=73), or to the antibiotic group (AG), which received cefazolin 1g at the time of anesthesia induction and every 6h for 24h (n=73). No antibiotics were prescribed to any of the participants after this period. SSI occurrence was evaluated using criteria and definitions from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The participants were assessed weekly for 30 days by a surgeon blinded to group allocation.

Results: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of main characteristics. The median age, body mass index, weight of excised breast tissue, and surgery time of the 146 participants were 33 years, 25.2 Kg/m², 925 g, and 220 min, respectively. Superficial dehiscence occurred in 30 patients (20.5%), with 16 in the placebo group and 14 in the antibiotic group (P=0.682). Eight participants (5.5%) had SSI, with four in each group (P=1.000). In all cases, SSI was classified as superficial incisional.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that extending antibiotic prophylaxis beyond a single dose administered during anesthesia induction does not significantly reduce the incidence of SSIs or wound dehiscence in reduction mammaplasty.

Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov. NCT04079686.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012263DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anesthesia induction
12
antibiotic prophylaxis
8
reduction mammaplasty
8
single dose
8
placebo group
8
group received
8
received cefazolin
8
cefazolin time
8
time anesthesia
8
antibiotic group
8

Similar Publications