Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: This study compared the effects of continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) on cortical activity modulation and upper limb motor recovery in subacute stroke patients.
Design: A total of 105 subacute stroke patients with unilateral upper limb impairment were randomly divided into three groups: cTBS, LF-rTMS, and sham. Main outcomes included Fugl-Meyer Assessment (UEFM) and modified Barthel Index (MBI) scores at baseline, 4 weeks (post-treatment), and 12 weeks (follow-up). Secondary outcomes evaluated cortical activation via functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).
Results: Among 103 recruited participants, 98 completed follow-up. Both cTBS and LF-rTMS groups showed significantly greater UEFM improvement than the sham group at 4 and 12 weeks (P < 0.05), while MBI scores did not differ significantly. fNIRS revealed that active treatments suppressed contralesional primary motor cortex activation, with cTBS additionally inhibiting premotor and supplementary motor areas.
Conclusion: cTBS and LF-rTMS effectively enhanced upper limb motor motricity in stroke patients compared to sham stimulation, suggesting their potential as non-invasive neuromodulatory therapies for post-stroke rehabilitation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002792 | DOI Listing |