Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Patients' QoL scores during chemotherapy are generally measured during hospital visits. However, patients frequently recover from AEs before hospital arrival. This study continuously assessed each chemotherapy's impact on patients' QoL scores during hospital visits and at home using an electronic device (ePRO).
Methods: This multicenter, prospective observational study was conducted in 29 Japanese hospitals. Patients were treated with liposomal irinotecan, fluorouracil, and levoleucovorin (Nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV), gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP), or gemcitabine (GEM) as second-line chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer. All respondents used ePRO to answer several QoL questionnaires on Days 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 11 following chemotherapy administration. The primary endpoint was the EQ-5D-5L index value, and the secondary endpoints were AE frequency and the EORTC QLQ-C30.
Results: The analysis included 67 participants. The mean ± SD QoL scores of the Nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV and GnP arms varied from 0.803 ± 0.142 to 0.678 ± 0.247 and 0.872 ± 0.077 to 0.726 ± 0.185, respectively, over the evaluation period. The highest and lowest QoL scores were observed around the chemotherapy administration and approximately 1 week after the chemotherapy administration, respectively, in both arms.
Conclusions: Patients' QoL score assessment over time by ePRO revealed QoL score trends, which emphasized the importance of QoL management outside of hospital visits for each chemotherapy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378663 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71161 | DOI Listing |