98%
921
2 minutes
20
BackgroundWhile numerous studies regarding the need for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for evaluation of suspected blunt cervical spine injury (BCSI) exist, the resulting recommendations are often conflicting and are less reliably applicable to non-examinable or National Emergency X-radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS)-positive patients. This study sought to identify the utility of MRI in characterizing BCSI in such patients who had already undergone computed tomography (CT) imaging of the cervical spine.MethodsRecords from 402 unique patients presenting to a Level 1 trauma center were analyzed. Incidence of positive MRI in the setting of negative CT, unstable BCSI on either modality, need for surgical intervention, time in a cervical collar, and hospital readmission rates were calculated.ResultsNon-examinable or NEXUS-positive patients with BCSI identified on both CT and MRI were less likely to have a stable BCSI compared to CT-positive alone (53% vs 88%, = 0.001). Out of 189 CT-negative patients, 53 (28%) were found to have BCSI on MRI, with 13 (6.8% overall) requiring operative intervention. Out of 100 BCSIs read as "stable" on CT, 28 (23.1%) were deemed "unstable" on subsequent MRI. Patients with negative MRI findings spent less time in a cervical collar than patients with positive findings (median 2 days vs 57 days, < 0.001) and had lower 180-day readmission rates (12 patients [7.5%] vs 35 [15%], = 0.031).ConclusionWhile CT remains vital for diagnosing BCSI, non-examinable or NEXUS-positive patients with negative CT should undergo confirmatory MRI prior to cervical collar removal.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00031348251371195 | DOI Listing |
Am Surg
August 2025
Department of General Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA.
BackgroundWhile numerous studies regarding the need for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for evaluation of suspected blunt cervical spine injury (BCSI) exist, the resulting recommendations are often conflicting and are less reliably applicable to non-examinable or National Emergency X-radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS)-positive patients. This study sought to identify the utility of MRI in characterizing BCSI in such patients who had already undergone computed tomography (CT) imaging of the cervical spine.MethodsRecords from 402 unique patients presenting to a Level 1 trauma center were analyzed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Surg
January 2018
Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Introduction: The National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) criteria have been criticized due to the presumed unreliability of the clinical exam in elderly patients. The objective of this study was to determine if the NEXUS criteria can be safely applied to this vulnerable group of patients.
Methods: 596 trauma patients over the age of 65 were enrolled in a prospectively designed study between April 1, 2015 and October 1, 2016.
J Emerg Med
September 2015
Westmead Hospital Emergency Department, Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Background: The incidence of cervical spine injuries (CSI) in people over 65 years of age from low-energy mechanisms is far greater than in younger populations. Algorithms and decision rules exist for selection of trauma patients requiring cervical spine imaging.
Objectives: To determine the validity of the NEXUS criteria in the elderly population with low-mechanism injuries.