Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: Neurosurgery remains one of the most competitive residency programs with an increasing application volume. Signaling was introduced to allow applicants to express interest in specific programs and streamline program director application review; however, there are limited data on how signaling affects interview invitations in neurosurgery. This study investigates the impact of signaling on interview invitation odds and subsequent residency program selection.

Methods: The authors analyzed data from 93 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited neurosurgery residency programs from the 2024 application cycle, sourced from the Residency Explorer platform. A signal strength index (SSI) was created using two metrics: odds ratio (OR) of receiving an invitation to interview for signaling and nonsignaling applicants and absolute difference in interview rates between these applicant groups. Correlations among SSI, Doximity program rankings, and program location were also examined. Statistical significance was set at an α of 0.05.

Results: Signaling a program significantly influenced interview invitations, with 19 programs (20.4%) inviting only applicants who signaled their institution and 65 programs (69.9%) inviting < 10% of applicants who did not signal the program. Doximity program rankings were weakly correlated with the SSI (Pearson's r = 0.26, p = 0.01) and moderately correlated with a program's OR rank (Pearson's r = 0.44, p < 0.01). After controlling for Doximity rank, program size was negatively correlated with the OR rank (Pearson's r = -0.26, p = 0.01). The geographic location of a program did not correlate with the SSI (p = 0.48).

Conclusions: Signaling plays a key role in neurosurgery residency interview invitations, with its impact varying across programs based on factors like program rank and competitiveness. The SSI represents a comprehensive tool for applicants to assess which programs to signal, optimizing their chances of receiving an offer to interview.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2025.4.JNS25227DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

interview invitations
16
signaling interview
12
program
10
impact signaling
8
interview
8
residency programs
8
neurosurgery residency
8
doximity program
8
program rankings
8
rank pearson's
8

Similar Publications

Background: INTERASPIRE was an observational study of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) from 88 hospitals in 14 countries across all six WHO regions. The objective was to describe the proportions of patients referred to and attending cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programmes and to compare lifestyle and risk factor target achievement according to participation in a CR programme.

Methods: Patients 18-80 years of age, with a first or recurrent coronary hospitalisation (acute coronary syndrome and/or revascularisation procedure) were identified and invited to an interview and examination, between six months and two years after the index hospitalisation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study aimed to explore participant reflections after receipt of prenatal genome sequencing (GS) results in the absence of fetal anomalies.

Methods: Participants invited to complete a semi-structured interview consented to future research, were English speaking, and were between 30 days and 1 year since the conclusion of their sequenced pregnancy. A total of 18 interviews were conducted with 21 participants (3 couples interviewed concurrently) representing 15 unique pregnancies (81% term deliveries, 14% terminated pregnancies, and 5% preterm delivery).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Past research has identified a source of miscommunication known as the "pseudotemporal" problem, whereby children mistakenly interpret invitations including the word 'time' (e.g., "tell me about the last time") as requests for temporal information (Friend et al.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: Single-handed oncology practice occurs when only one clinician covers a particular tumour site in a department. There is no quantified evidence about experiences of single-handed practice or its impact in oncology. A team supported by the Tessa Jowell Brain Cancer Mission interviewed 35 neuro-oncologists in the United Kingdom (UK) to better understand the workload, challenges and support networks of single-handed neuro-oncologists compared with those of neuro-oncologists at larger centres.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Family physicians (FPs) endorse the value of spiritual care (SC) as part of comprehensive, patient-centered care. However, a mismatch exists between patients' desire to have spiritual needs addressed and physicians' SC provision. Studies explore physician barriers, but few examine workplace barriers/facilitators.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF