Category Ranking
98%
Total Visits
921
Avg Visit Duration
2 minutes
Citations
20
Article Abstract
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/XAA.0000000000002047 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Solicitation by Spam: A Cross-Sectional Study of Predatory Publisher E-mails Received By Two Anesthesiologist Clinician-Scientists.
A A Pract
August 2025
From the Centre for Journalology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Decoding Correlations in Predatory Business Practices and Physicians' Strategies Against Daily Predatory Emails.
Cureus
November 2024
Intensive Care Medicine, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, NLD.
Introduction Predatory journals are marked by inadequate editorial practices and peer review processes, diverging from established global standards in scientific publishing. This article, as a component of the ASGLOS Study, aims to explore the relationship between participant demographics and their experiences with targeted predatory business activities, including their approaches to managing daily predatory emails. Methods To collect the personal experiences of physicians' mailboxes on predatory publishing, a Google Form® survey was designed and disseminated from September 2021 to April 2022.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAcademic Citation Partnership: A Predatory Practice that Undermines Scholarly Integrity.
Ann Biomed Eng
November 2024
General Education Department, Colegio de Muntinlupa, Muntinlupa City, Philippines.
Recently, academic circles have raised concerns about academic citation partnerships. Many researchers receive emails offering these partnerships, often landing in their spam folders. In this paper, I refer to academic citation partnerships as unethical collaborative arrangements where researchers or authors agree to cite each other's work in their academic publications to enhance their academic profiles, often measured by metrics like the h-index.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUnsolicited Invitations to Scientific Meetings: Radiologists' Experience.
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol
July 2023
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD.
Article Synopsis
- Unsolicited invitations to speak at medical meetings are increasing and primarily used as spam and phishing tactics targeting radiologists.
- In a 2-week study, 73.3% of faculty members received a total of 188 inappropriate invitation emails, with a mean of 4.13 invites per faculty.
- The majority (over 96%) of these invitations were irrelevant to their specialties, with the most significant factor for receiving more solicitations being a higher publication count since 2022.
[Predatory journals: A real threat for medical research. 1. Identify these journals and understand how they work].
Rev Med Interne
June 2021
Comité scientifique, IRAFPA (Institute of Research and Action on Fraud and Plagiarism in Academia), Genève, Suisse; H2MVV, 30, rue Faidherbe, 75011 Paris, France.
The "author-pay" model of open access publication, which appeared in 2002, allocates to the author or his institution the costs of processing articles due to the journal after acceptance, for an amount of a few hundred to several thousand euros. New publishers emerged towards the end of the 2000s, which used this model but with purely commercial objectives, offering naive authors and/or wishing to quickly expand their curriculum vitae by publications in "predatory journals". They are characterized by aggressive e-mail solicitations, lack of ethics, lack of details about the publisher and the editorial board, poor peer review, unspecified and low fees for processing articles, a lack of indexing and the promise of rapid publication.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF