Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Doctoral dissertations in medicine provide precise insights into the state of knowledge and research methodology at a particular time. In contrast to more canonised textbook texts, dissertations often present scientific discourses and different views in a more detailed and therefore more comprehensible manner. This makes them relevant sources for tracing and analysing the development of the specialist field, but they are often not a focus of research into the history of science, partly due to insufficient documentation. In the context of a research project on dissertation culture in urology, this article uses the example of the Dorpat surgeon Georg Adelmann to analyse the embedding of an early dissertation on endourology in the contemporary research debate.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12394301 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00120-025-02653-y | DOI Listing |