A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Effect of oral proton pump inhibitor administration on reducing the delayed bleeding risk in five upper gastrointestinal endoscopic treatments. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: Although proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is often prescribed for reducing delayed bleeding in upper gastrointestinal endoscopic treatments, no studies with a sufficient sample size evaluated its reduced effect compared with absence of acid-suppressive agents. This study aimed to investigate the effect of oral PPI on reducing delayed bleeding in five upper gastrointestinal endoscopic treatments.

Methods: This population-based cohort study collected data from patients who were either prescribed with PPIs or received no acid-suppressive therapy and who underwent esophageal endoscopic mucosal resection (E-EMR), esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (E-ESD), gastric endoscopic mucosal resection (G-EMR), gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (G-ESD), or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in Japan between 2012 and 2022 from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. The primary outcome was delayed bleeding in each procedure. We conducted propensity score matching (PSM) to balance two comparison groups and performed logistic regression analyses to compare bleeding outcomes.

Results: This study included data on 172,635 patients. After PSM, the delayed bleeding risk with PPI use was significantly lower in G-EMR (odds ratio [OR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.84) and G-ESD (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.30-0.50). In contrast, a lower delayed bleeding risk of PPI was not observed in E-EMR (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.56-1.99), E-ESD (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.86-1.38), and PEG (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.93-1.13). The subgroup and sensitivity analyses almost consistently confirmed the main results.

Conclusions: Oral PPI administration contributed to reducing delayed bleeding risk in G-EMR and G-ESD, but not in E-EMR, E-ESD, and PEG.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003746DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

delayed bleeding
28
reducing delayed
16
bleeding risk
16
upper gastrointestinal
12
gastrointestinal endoscopic
12
proton pump
8
pump inhibitor
8
bleeding
8
endoscopic
8
endoscopic treatments
8

Similar Publications