A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Randomized controlled trial of semi-individualized 3D-printed tissue retraction devices vs. standard shielding splints in head and neck cancer treated with intensity-modulated and particle radiotherapy (GUARD). | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background And Purpose: This randomized controlled trial evaluated whether tissue-retraction devices (TRDs) lessen severe radiation-induced oral mucositis (RIOM) versus standard flexible intraoral shielding splints (IOS) in patients receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), carbon-ion RT, or combined-modality RT for head-and-neck cancer (HNC). Although TRDs may spare normal tissue, randomized evidence with an active control under contemporary RT techniques remains scarce.

Materials And Methods: HNC patients requiring RT at University Hospital Heidelberg (2020-2023) were randomized 1:1 to receive a semi-individualized, 3D-printed TRD or standard IOS. The primary outcome was severe RIOM (RTOG/CTCAE grade ≥3) at RT completion, assessed by video endoscopy in a predefined region adjacent/opposite to the clinical target volume. Secondary endpoints included acute and late toxicities, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and dosimetric comparisons of organs at risk, including the tongue and palate.

Results: Of 34 randomized patients, 29 were evaluable (225 regions assessed). TRD significantly reduced the rate of RIOM grade ≥3 with 0/13 TRD vs. 9/16 IOS patients affected (p < 0.001). Grade 1-2 RIOM occurred in 7 (54 %) TRD vs. 2 (12 %) IOS. Among patients with tumors above the oral cavity, TRD significantly reduced tongue mean dose (median Dmean: 16.71 Gy [IQR: 2.41-20.71] vs. 29.26 Gy [IQR: 21.56-42.52]; p = 0.034). PROs trended toward less oral pain and swallowing difficulty with TRD.

Conclusion: TRD reduced severe RIOM in displaced normal tissues while improving tongue and palate dosimetry. Findings support TRD integration into clinical practice, though larger trials are needed to assess long-term patient-reported benefits and large-scale implementation.

Trial Registration: NCT04454697.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2025.107604DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

randomized controlled
8
controlled trial
8
semi-individualized 3d-printed
8
shielding splints
8
ios patients
8
grade ≥3
8
randomized
5
trial semi-individualized
4
3d-printed tissue
4
tissue retraction
4

Similar Publications