Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objectives: Referral documentation may either contribute to diagnostic excellence or play a role in diagnostic errors (DEs), but its exact impact remains unclear. This study investigates the association between referral documentation and DEs among patients initially evaluated by another hospital or department and subsequently referred to the general internal medicine (GIM) outpatient clinic of an acute care tertiary hospital in Japan.
Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed outpatients who visited the GIM outpatient clinic between April 1, 2017 and March 31, 2023. Patients initially evaluated at another medical facility or department, who then visited the GIM outpatient clinic, and were subsequently readmitted unexpectedly within 14 days after GIM outpatient clinic visit were included. DEs were identified using the Revised Safer Dx Instrument. Errors were analyzed using the Diagnostic Error Evaluation and Research (DEER) taxonomy. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between referral letters and DEs.
Results: Of 80 patients, 29 (36.3 %) experienced DEs. Referral letters were present for 52 (65.0 %) patients. The proportion of DEs was lower in the referred patients compared to non-referred patients (25.0 vs. 57.1 %; p-value=0.004). After adjusting for age, sex, race, multimorbidity, type of previous physicians, and post-graduate year of the GIM physician, the presence of a referral letter was associated with a substantially likelihood of DEs (OR=0.20, 95 % CI: 0.06-0.62, p-value=0.005).
Conclusions: The presence of a referral letter facilitates accurate diagnoses while markedly reducing DEs. Healthcare systems should consider promoting the proper use of referral systems.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/dx-2024-0197 | DOI Listing |