Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background And Aims: The 3-D volume of a pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) has not been fully investigated in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided treatment.
Methods: In 372 patients, we examined the 3-D volume in relation to the clinical outcomes.
Results: In walled-off necrosis, 3-D volume was associated with time to clinical success and in-hospital mortality with a multivariable subdistribution hazard ratio of 0.43 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.66; P = .010) and a multivariable odds ratio of 30.9 (95% CI, 4.31-222; P = .004), respectively (for ≥ 1,000 cm vs. < 250 cm). In pseudocysts, 3-D volume was associated with in-hospital mortality (P = .014) with a multivariable odds ratio of 12.5 (95% CI, 0.81-193; for ≥ 500 cm vs. < 100 cm). The maximum diameter represented a comparable model goodness-of-fit.
Conclusions: PFC volume was associated with the outcomes of EUS-guided interventions, and the maximum diameter may be a reasonable surrogate.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2025.08.015 | DOI Listing |