A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Prognostic significance of molecular classification in high-risk endometrial cancer patients undergoing sentinel lymph node mapping. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: The adoption of selective sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as a viable alternative to lymphadenectomy, along with the redefinition of nodal risk groups based on molecular classification, has significantly changed the management of early-stage, high-risk preoperative endometrial cancer.

Materials And Methods: A retrospective, multicenter study was conducted under the auspices of the Spanish Gynecologic Oncology Group to evaluate recurrence rates and oncologic outcomes in patients stratified by molecular risk. Three groups were compared: SLNB alone (G1), SLNB combined with pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy (G2), and pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy without SLNB (G3). The primary endpoint was recurrence rate; secondary endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), recurrence patterns.

Results: A total of 221 patients from 14 centers were included, with a median follow-up of 24.4 months (IQR 17-42). Forty-four patients (19.9 %) experienced recurrence. Relapse rates were 15.4 % in G1, 15.8 % in G2, and 22.2 % in G3 (p = 0.479). DFS rates were 84.6 % in G1, 84.1 % in G2, and 77.8 % in G3 (p = 0.56). OS rates were 94.2 %, 90.9 %, and 92.6 %, respectively (p = 0.651). Among the 44 patients with documented recurrence, seven had nodal recurrences, with only two occurring in the group managed with SLNB alone.

Conclusion: In this study, patients with early-stage, high-risk preoperative endometrial cancer-classified by molecular subgroups-showed no significant differences in relapse rates, disease-free survival, or overall survival across the three management strategies. Further prospective studies with longer follow-up are warranted to validate these preliminary findings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110385DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

molecular classification
8
sentinel lymph
8
lymph node
8
early-stage high-risk
8
high-risk preoperative
8
preoperative endometrial
8
pelvic and/or
8
and/or para-aortic
8
para-aortic lymphadenectomy
8
disease-free survival
8

Similar Publications