A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Research in Partnership With Older People-Involvement in Conducting and Analysing Focus Groups. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: Data collection and analysis in collaboration with co-researchers has rarely been described, and its impact on the research process and outcomes remains unknown. Thus, this study involved older co-researchers in the moderation and analysis of focus groups and describes process and outcomes.

Methods: The SeFallED project included collaboration with co-researchers in the moderation and analysis of focus group interviews. Three focus groups were co-moderated by an academic researcher and three by a co-researcher. The co-analysis was conducted in collaboration with two co-researchers for three transcripts. Research diaries were maintained throughout the process for reflection. These were supplemented by feedback from the focus group participants. Moderation and analysis were described with regard to the questions and derived categories.

Results: Reflections on the process highlight both facilitators and challenges in involving co-researchers. A positive atmosphere and training for co-researchers can be beneficial, whereas the significant time requirements can be challenging. With regard to outcomes, our analysis showed that collaboration led to a greater focus on focus group participants' feelings and facilitated a more profound comprehension of their statements.

Conclusion: The present study provides recommendations for the process of co-researcher involvement in conducting and analysing focus groups. Involving co-researchers requires a positive atmosphere, training and adequate time. Furthermore, our findings help to sensitise researchers to the potential impacts on research outcomes.

Patient Or Public Contribution: Three co-researchers collaborated in the moderation and analysis of the focus groups. All three co-researchers reviewed this paper.

Clinical Trial Registration: The SeFallED project was registered at the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS00025949, Registration Date: 4 November 2021).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12367270PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.70354DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

focus groups
20
moderation analysis
16
collaboration co-researchers
12
analysis focus
12
focus group
12
focus
9
co-researchers
9
conducting analysing
8
analysing focus
8
analysis collaboration
8

Similar Publications