Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Cognitive screening to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia in primary care settings has proven to be a challenging task. The ideal solution would be a brief, yet sensitive, tool appropriate for use with individuals from diverse educational and cultural backgrounds that requires limited time and expertise from clinic staff. The purpose of this project was (1) to develop an automated cognitive screening tool incorporating cognitive and speech/language data using machine learning techniques for potential use in primary care settings and (2) to compare its classification accuracy to an established cognitive screening measure.
Methods: Participants were 53 cognitively normal and 51 cognitively impaired older adults. Each completed a working memory (WM) and four speaking tasks, followed by a second administration of WM to investigate the added utility of practice effects. Bayesian additive regression trees were used to test nine models, and the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment screen was administered as a comparator.
Results: The top feature set consisted of both administrations of the WM task and a personal narrative task and achieved a cross-validated classification accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve) of 0.84, which was slightly better than the comparator.
Discussion: Combining WM and acoustic and linguistic variables derived from connected speaking tasks discriminated cognitively normal from cognitively impaired groups with a high degree of accuracy.
Highlights: Working memory and speaking tasks were used for detection of cognitive impairment.This combination distinguished cognitively normal from impaired older adults.This automated tool may overcome barriers to cognitive screening in primary care.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12358941 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.70145 | DOI Listing |