A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Programmed Intermittent Bolus versus Continuous Infusion for Regional Analgesia Following Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Continuous regional analgesia techniques have emerged as a more effective alternative for postoperative analgesia, but the clinical efficacy of infusion modes in thoracoscopic surgery remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of programmed intermittent bolus infusion (PIBI) with continuous infusion (CI) for regional analgesia in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for relevant research from inception to March 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PIBI with CI for regional analgesia following thoracoscopic surgery were included. The meta-analysis was made by using ReMan 5.4 software.

Results: We included 7 RCTs with 394 patients. For resting VAS at 6 h, there was no significant difference between PIBI and CI (MD = -0.52, 95% CI: -1.23 to 0.20). PIBI was more likely to reduce the resting VAS at 12 h, movement VAS at 12 h, and morphine consumption in first 24 h. PIBI had lower local anesthetic consumption and wider range of sensory blockade than CI. However, there were no significant difference between PIBI and CI in terms of the resting VAS at 24 h, resting VAS at 48 h, movement VAS at 6 h, movement VAS at 24 h, movement VAS at 48 h, morphine consumption in second 24 h, and number of people using additional analgesics.

Conclusion: PIBI provided a lower local anesthetic consumption and a wider sensory blockade compared to CI for regional analgesia following thoracoscopic surgery, although no significant clinical differences were observed in postoperative pain scores, opioid consumptions, and number of people using additional analgesics.

Limitation: The heterogeneity may influence the pooled estimates, the conclusion was only suitable for pulmonary surgery, the lack of long-term follow-up data on chronic pain outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12358133PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S530018DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

regional analgesia
20
thoracoscopic surgery
16
resting vas
16
movement vas
16
analgesia thoracoscopic
12
programmed intermittent
8
intermittent bolus
8
continuous infusion
8
infusion regional
8
systematic review
8

Similar Publications