Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
The electronic band gap of a two-dimensional semiconductor within a device architecture is sensitive to variations in screening properties of adjacent materials in the device and to gate-controlled doping. Here, we employ microfocused angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy to separate band gap renormalization effects stemming from environmental screening and electron doping during in situ gating of a single-layer WS_{2} device. The WS_{2} is supported on hexagonal boron nitride and contains a section that is exposed to vacuum and another section that is encapsulated by a graphene contact. We directly observe the doping-induced semiconductor-metal transition and band gap renormalization in the two sections of WS_{2}. Surprisingly, a larger band gap renormalization is observed in the vacuum-exposed section than in the graphene-encapsulated-and thus ostensibly better screened-section of the WS_{2}. Using GW calculations, we determine that intrinsic screening due to stronger doping in vacuum-exposed WS_{2} exceeds the external environmental screening in graphene-encapsulated WS_{2}.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/yllv-5zx7 | DOI Listing |