A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Machine Learning Models for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Burn Patients. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Aim: To develop and evaluate predictive models for in-hospital mortality in burn patients using machine learning (ML) techniques.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from burn patients admitted to Ankara Bilkent City Hospital Burn Treatment Center between 2015 and 2020. Key variables including age, gender, total body surface area burned, burn depth, burn type, inhalation injury, inflammatory markers and inflammatory indexes were collected. Seven ML models-Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbors, Naive Bayes, and Gradient Boosting-were trained and evaluated.

Results: The cohort included 218 patients (mean age 42.5 ± 18.5 years; 69.7% male, 30.3% female), with an in-hospital mortality rate of 18.8% (n = 41). Logistic Regression had the best performance (accuracy: 88.6%, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC)-Area Under Curve (AUC): 0.906), while Random Forest achieved the highest accuracy (90.9%) and recall (97.2%). K-Nearest Neighbors excelled in recall (99.0%), Gradient Boosting balanced precision and recall (91.6% each, ROC-AUC: 0.744), and Support Vector Machine showed moderate results (accuracy: 84.0%, ROC-AUC: 0.864).

Conclusions: ML models, particularly Logistic Regression and Random Forest, demonstrated strong predictive capabilities for mortality in burn patients. This study supports the potential for ML in burn care, offering a data-driven approach for personalized prognosis and clinical decision-making. Further multicenter validation is recommended.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.62713/aic.3944DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

burn patients
16
in-hospital mortality
12
mortality burn
12
random forest
12
machine learning
8
burn
8
regression random
8
support vector
8
vector machine
8
k-nearest neighbors
8

Similar Publications