A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Keratometry repeatability in healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes: a comparison of two swept-source devices. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the keratometry repeatability obtained with two swept-source devices in healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes.

Methods: One hundred volunteers aged between 20 and 55 years were recruited for this study including both healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes. Patients included in the post-refractive surgery group underwent Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) or Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK). Three consecutive measurements were taken with the IOLMaster 700 and Anterion and the evaluated measurements were simulated keratometry (Sim K), posterior keratometry (PK), and total keratometry (TK). Repeatability was assessed through the intra-subject standard deviation (S), repeatability limit (R), and variability coefficient (CoV).

Results: Fifty patients were included in the control and post-refractive surgery groups, respectively. Similar repeatability was obtained for healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes using both devices. For IOLMaster 700, R ranged between 0.16 and 0.22 D for Sim K, 0.09-0.11 D for PK, and 0.18-0.24 D for TK. For Anterion, R ranged between 0.19 and 0.20 D for Sim K, 0.02 D for PK, and 0.20-0.21 D for TK. In general, the control group showed slightly higher S and R values than the post-refractive surgery group for TK and astigmatism measurements obtained with both devices.

Conclusions: IOLMaster 700 and Anterion demonstrated good repeatability for simulated and total keratometry measurements obtained in healthy and post-refractive eyes. Moreover, the keratometry repeatability was comparable between healthy and post-refractive eyes using both SS-OCT devices.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-025-06893-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

post-refractive surgery
28
healthy post-refractive
24
keratometry repeatability
16
surgery eyes
12
iolmaster 700
12
post-refractive
9
repeatability healthy
8
swept-source devices
8
patients included
8
surgery group
8

Similar Publications