A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Massively Parallel Free Energy Calculations for Affinity Maturation of Designed Miniproteins. | LitMetric

Massively Parallel Free Energy Calculations for Affinity Maturation of Designed Miniproteins.

J Chem Theory Comput

Department of Chemistry, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, United States.

Published: August 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Computational protein design efforts continue to make remarkable advances, yet the discovery of high-affinity binders typically requires large-scale experimental screening of site-saturated mutant (SSM) libraries. Here, we explore how massively parallel free energy methods can be used for affinity maturation of designed binding proteins. Using an expanded ensemble (EE) approach, we perform exhaustive relative binding free energy calculations for SSM variants of three miniproteins designed to bind influenza A H1 hemagglutinin by Chevalier et al. [Chevalier, A.; Silva, D. A.; Rocklin, G. J.; 2017, 550, 74-79]. We compare our predictions to experimental ΔΔ values inferred from a Bayesian analysis of the high-throughput sequencing data, and to state-of-the-art predictions made using the Flex ddG Rosetta protocol. A systematic comparison reveals prediction accuracies around 2 kcal/mol, and identifies net charge changes, large numbers of alchemical atoms, and slow side chain conformational dynamics as key contributors to the uncertainty of the EE predictions. Flex ddG predictions are more accurate on average, but highly conservative. In contrast, EE predictions can better classify stabilizing and destabilizing mutations. We also explored the ability of SSM scans to rationalize known affinity-matured variants containing multiple mutations, which are nonadditive due to epistatic effects. Simple electrostatic models fail to explain nonadditivity, but observed mutations are found at positions with higher Shannon entropies. Overall, this work suggests that simulation-based free energy methods can provide predictive information for affinity maturation of designed miniproteins, with many feasible improvements to the efficiency and accuracy within reach.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00703DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

free energy
16
affinity maturation
12
maturation designed
12
massively parallel
8
parallel free
8
energy calculations
8
designed miniproteins
8
energy methods
8
predictions flex
8
flex ddg
8

Similar Publications