Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Two common forms of sialic acid, Neu5Ac and Neu5Gc, are crucial components of mammalian glycosylation, with distinct roles in various biological processes. Despite their prevalence in mice, differences in their distribution between widely-used model systems, mouse liver tissues and cell lines, are rarely considered. In this study, we demonstrated a long-neglected phenomenon of an inversion of Neu5Gc and Neu5Ac levels between the two sample types by conducting N-glycoproteome analysis at intact glycopeptide level and independent validation assays. Additionally, we show that during the immortalization process of mouse primary liver cells, alterations in the CMAH gene drive a shift in Neu5Gc and Neu5Ac levels. These findings highlight the distinct expression patterns of the two sialic acid forms in both in vivo and in vitro models, cautioning researchers to consider the sample types when studying sialic acid biology.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2025.123910 | DOI Listing |