Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Aim: To investigate possible differences in neurodevelopment between lockdown-exposed and non-exposed 18-month-old toddlers in Sweden.
Methods: Data were extracted from the prospective NorthPop Birth Cohort Study in Sweden. Neurodevelopment was assessed using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire Third Edition (ASQ-3) and a clinical routine evaluation at the child health care centre for additional validation. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics.
Results: More lockdown-exposed toddlers fell below the cut-off score on the ASQ-3 "Gross motor function" assessment at 18 months, compared to the pre-lockdown category (5.1% vs. 3.6%, adjusted p = 0.002). Conversely, fewer lockdown-exposed toddlers failed the fine motor task "Can draw scribble" versus the pre-lockdown category (1.4% vs. 2.4% adjusted p = 0.014).
Conclusions: Toddlers who were lockdown-exposed had lower gross motor function but were more successful in the fine motor task at 18 months.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.70266 | DOI Listing |