Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Brain metastasis (BM) is one of the common ways of tumor metastasis and has a poor prognosis. This study aims to identify potential biomarkers from the perspective of somatic mutations, providing a basis for the prognosis evaluation and immunogenicity prediction of BM patients.
Methods: This study collected the somatic mutation profiles and clinical information of a total of 421 patients with BM in Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC). Non-negative matrix factorization was employed to extract the mutational process signatures operating in the genome. Consensus clustering analysis was utilized to identify mutation-related molecular subtypes. Through a comprehensive analysis of genomic mutations and copy number variations (CNV), biomarkers associated with outcomes and tumor immunogenicity were screened.
Results: Non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, and breast cancer were common primary tumors of BM, and these three tumor types exhibited better prognosis compared to other types. This study found that a higher tumor mutation burden (TMB) was significantly associated with a better prognosis of BM. A total of four mutational process signatures were extracted, and among them, a signature featured by C > T mutations and related to DNA damage repair was proven to be linked with an inferior outcome and a lower TMB. Through integrated genomic mutation analysis, mutation was determined to associate with improved prognosis of BM. More importantly, patients carrying this mutation also harbored a better response to immunotherapy. CNV analysis indicated that deletion and deletion were respectively associated with poorer and better outcomes in patients with BM.
Conclusions: By integrating the somatic mutation data of patients with BM, this study identified molecular biomarkers related to outcomes and immunogenicity from three perspectives: mutational process signatures, molecular subtypes, and genomic variations. Our findings provide clues for prognosis evaluation in BM patients. They also establish a theoretical basis for predicting immunotherapy efficacy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12343737 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1607772 | DOI Listing |