98%
921
2 minutes
20
The environmental fate of cellulose-based "biodegradable" wet wipes in freshwater ecosystems remains poorly understood, despite growing market demand and legislative shifts banning plastic-containing alternatives. This study evaluated the degradation behaviour of two commercially available biodegradable wet wipe brands in upland stream mesocosms mimicking real-world river conditions. Using tensile strength loss (TSL) as the primary degradation metric, wipe degradation was compared across varied pH, temperature, nutrient, and light regimes, alongside cotton strip controls. Results revealed that although degradation rates varied by material and environmental context, both wet wipe brands persisted in river systems for 5 weeks, with Brand A degrading ∼50 % faster than Brand B and nearly twice as fast as cotton controls. Degradation was significantly influenced by pH, temperature, and total dissolved solids, but not by wipe positioning in the water column (hyporheic, submerged, surface) or microbial biomass alone. Temperature-adjusted TSL (% per degree day) emerged as the most robust degradation metric, suggesting initial physical disintegration preceded microbial breakdown. These findings challenge current biodegradability claims and highlight the need for regulatory testing under environmentally relevant freshwater conditions to ensure truly biodegradable wet wipe products.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126971 | DOI Listing |
Environ Pollut
August 2025
School of Biosciences and Water Research Institute, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AX, United Kingdom. Electronic address:
The environmental fate of cellulose-based "biodegradable" wet wipes in freshwater ecosystems remains poorly understood, despite growing market demand and legislative shifts banning plastic-containing alternatives. This study evaluated the degradation behaviour of two commercially available biodegradable wet wipe brands in upland stream mesocosms mimicking real-world river conditions. Using tensile strength loss (TSL) as the primary degradation metric, wipe degradation was compared across varied pH, temperature, nutrient, and light regimes, alongside cotton strip controls.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Microbiol
April 2025
Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Prev Vet Med
June 2025
School of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, 464 Bearsden Road, Bearsden, Glasgow, Scotland G61 1QH, UK. Electronic address:
Excessive bacterial contamination (≥100,000 colony forming units [CFU]/ml total bacteria count (TBC) and ≥ 10,000 CFU/ml total coliform count [TCC]) reduces the quality of colostrum and subsequent absorption of IgG across neonatal enterocytes, leading to failure to transfer of passive immunity (FTPI). Furthermore, the presence of pathogenic bacteria can cause disease in their own right. The objectives of the study were to identify critical control points and farm risk factors to minimise colostrum contamination from Scottish dairy herds.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWater Res
January 2025
School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, United Kingdom. Electronic address:
Flushed wet wipes pose a significant pollution risk to river systems at both macro and micro levels. However, the link between their emissions and environmental contamination remains unclear. Here we integrated emissions-based modelling with existing data on wet wipe disposal and microfibre generation to predict the quantity of emissions entering river systems and the transport pathways involved.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDisaster Med Public Health Prep
October 2024
Arizona Poison and Drug Information Center, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Objective: Rinsing only with water or washing with soap and water are common methods of skin decontamination for skin contaminated during a chemical hazard release. The null hypothesis was that a 15-minute water irrigation (decontamination method 1) would not be superior to decontamination using a microfiber towel, followed by a wet wipe (Signature Select Softly Flushable Tissue Better Living Brands LLC, Pleasanton, CA), followed by using another microfiber towel (decontamination method 2).
Methods: A simulated contaminant (Magic Fluorescent Glow Paint for Face and Body, iLC Shenzhen Fulimei Technology Co.