98%
921
2 minutes
20
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305657.].
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12348973 | PMC |
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330305 | PLOS |
Clin Linguist Phon
August 2019
i Educational Psychology and Methodology , University at Albany, SUNY , Albany, NY , USA.
Current findings from intervention in bilingual aphasia are inconclusive regarding the extent to which levels of language proficiency and degree of linguistic distance between treated and non-treated languages influence cross-language generalisation and changes in levels of language activation and inhibition following treatment. In this study, we enrolled a 65-year-old multilingual speaker with aphasia and administered treatment in his L1, Dutch. We assessed pre- and post-treatment performance for seven of his languages, five of high proficiency and two of lower proficiency.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF