A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

High-risk clonal groups of avian pathogenic (APEC) demonstrate heterogeneous phenotypic characteristics and . | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Avian Pathogenic (APEC), a major bacterial pathogen of poultry, comprises a diverse range of high-risk clonal groups. However how these lineages interact with avian host cells remains poorly characterized. This study examined the ability of key APEC clonal groups to adhere to, invade, and survive within avian host cells, alongside assessing their virulence in the infection model. Genomic analysis of APEC from a UK turkey colibacillosis outbreak identified ST-101 as the dominant clonal group, carrying numerous virulence factors. ST-101 was compared to other high-risk APEC clonal groups (ST-23, ST-140, ST-95, ST-117). Utilizing cell culture models, APEC isolates displayed comparable adhesion to 8E11 chicken epithelial gut and HD11 chicken macrophage cell lines. APEC ST-95, ST-101, and ST-140 demonstrated increased invasion of 8E11 cells, and intracellular survival within HD11 macrophages, relative to ST-23 and ST-117, suggesting pronounced phenotypic differences between clonal groups. However, in HD11 cell assays, no difference in magnitude of elicited immune response was observed between lineages, indicating differing intracellular survival was not a result of immune response modulation. virulence in the infection model was also observed to differ between APEC genotypes, with ST-117 inducing the highest mortality, despite the comparatively lower epithelial invasion and intramacrophage survival for other lineages. Collectively, this suggests that diverse APEC genotypes have distinct phenotypic profiles and . These results highlight the need for intervention strategies that can simultaneously target a broad range of pathogenic lineages.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351747PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2025.2546682DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clonal groups
20
apec
9
high-risk clonal
8
avian pathogenic
8
pathogenic apec
8
avian host
8
host cells
8
apec clonal
8
virulence infection
8
infection model
8

Similar Publications