Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Simultaneous electroencephalography-functional magnetic resonance imaging (EEG-fMRI) has potential for elucidating brain activities but suffers from severe noise/artifacts in EEG. While several countermeasures have been developed, it remains difficult to evaluate noise reductions in the absence of ground truth in EEG. We introduce a new evaluation method which takes advantage of high test-retest reliability of EEG microstate metrics. We assumed, if the reliability is high for a pair of EEG recorded outside an MR scanner on two different days, then it should also be high for a pair of EEG recorded inside and outside the scanner on the same day if MR-induced noise is absent. Thus, noise should be removed in a way that the reliability increases. Accordingly, we obtained EEG both inside and outside the scanner on two different days. Using ICC as an index, we examined test-retest reliability for 1) a pair of EEG outside the scanner across the days, 2) a pair of EEG inside and outside the scanner on the same day, and 3) a pair of EEG inside the scanner across the days. MR-induced noise, BCG artifact in particular, was reduced with joint decorrelation with varying thresholds. We obtained moderately high reliability in all the three pairs (ICCs > 0.5), suggesting sufficient noise reductions. Taking these steps, the quality of EEG improved as assessed with its traces, power spectra density, and microstate templates in resting state as well as event-related potentials in a visual oddball task. We discuss advantages and limitations of this new evaluation method.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290594 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/imag_a_00272 | DOI Listing |